<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Evolving Bits &#187; Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.evolvingbits.com/category/twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.evolvingbits.com</link>
	<description>Django. Python. iPhone. Plone. Physical Computing. Worker Owned Cooperatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 09:12:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Taming Twitter and RSS in 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.evolvingbits.com/2009/01/08/taming-twitter-and-rss-in-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.evolvingbits.com/2009/01/08/taming-twitter-and-rss-in-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 05:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Gershon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microblogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evolvingbits.com/?p=48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I gleam more information through blogs and microblogs there comes a time when the fun wears off and overload sets in.
In 2009, I&#8217;ve decided to tame overload and reinstate fun with some simple rules:
For Twitter (and other microblogging services):

Follow only folks that have a reasonable number of posts per day. Chronic Twitters (some individuals, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I gleam more information through blogs and microblogs there comes a time when the fun wears off and overload sets in.</p>
<p>In 2009, I&#8217;ve decided to tame overload and reinstate fun with some simple rules:</p>
<p>For Twitter (and other microblogging services):</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Follow only folks that have a reasonable number of posts per day.</strong> Chronic Twitters (some individuals, but often sources like large blog sites or newspapers) force me to weed through a lot of cruft to come to the juicy information I can use.  No one has infinitely interesting things happening all day long.</li>
<li><strong>Twitter is not email</strong> &#8211; I find back-and-forth conversation via public twitter replies to be tedious unless one puts a bit of context in their reply.  If the reply is interesting in itself, I&#8217;ll spend the effort to flip to the initial Tweet and try to see what was initially said.</li>
<li><strong>For chronic Twitters</strong> that still do have some interesting morsels, I often stop following them on Twitter, but subscribe to their blog RSS and follow lower traffic there &#8212; RSS is much easier to skim through than Twitter.  Garden hose instead of fire hose.</li>
<li><strong>Don&#8217;t blindly follow! (good advice in many situations).</strong> When someone follows me, I check out their profile, recent Tweets, and number of Tweets per day before jumping in.  If a reasonable number of posts are interesting, and they&#8217;re not Tweeting every moment of their lives, I will follow them too.</li>
<li><strong>Keep it interesting!</strong> Sure, not every tweet someone makes is interesting, but many should be. Try out folks, but don&#8217;t be afraid to jump off without guilt.  I&#8217;m personally <strong>attracted to Tweets</strong> pointing me to resources, interesting sites, or interesting happenings &#8212; in other words, I rely on my social graph to provide interesting content, not noise.  I keep this in mind when posting Tweets for others.</li>
</ul>
<p>For RSS</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Cut out large noisy RSS feeds</strong> even if occasionally interesting.  Feeds that produce too much traffic (albeit this traffic can safely be higher than microblogging since it&#8217;s easier to skim) even if a few morsels are interesting should be tossed because they prevent you from reading the really interesting ones.</li>
</ul>
<p>We each have a limited amount of attention we can give &#8211; these simple rules will keep these services interesting and useful.</p>
<p><strong>What other techniques do people use</strong> to handle the growing amount of information coming at them through microblogging (e.g. Twitter, Facebook), location-aware microblogging (e.g. BrightKite) and good old fashion blogging (via RSS)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.evolvingbits.com/2009/01/08/taming-twitter-and-rss-in-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
